<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>(760) 242-3055</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.juratlegal.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.juratlegal.com</link>
	<description>Over 5,000 People Served</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:56:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>front1</title>
		<link>http://www.juratlegal.com/front1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.juratlegal.com/front1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[front]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juratlegal.com/?p=492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.juratlegal.com/front1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>front2</title>
		<link>http://www.juratlegal.com/front2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.juratlegal.com/front2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 19:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[front]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juratlegal.com/?p=494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.juratlegal.com/front2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>front3</title>
		<link>http://www.juratlegal.com/front3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.juratlegal.com/front3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 19:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[front]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juratlegal.com/?p=496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.juratlegal.com/front3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Process Server&#8217;s V. Sheriff&#8217;s: Who Do You Trust More?</title>
		<link>http://www.juratlegal.com/process-servers-v-sheriffs-who-do-you-trust-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.juratlegal.com/process-servers-v-sheriffs-who-do-you-trust-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 22:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juratlegal.com/?p=450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ServeNow&#8217;s infographic answers the question &#8216;Who should serve my legal papers: the process server or the sheriff?&#8217;
Denver, CO (PRWEB) December 07, 2011
ServeNow.com, a trusted network of process serving professionals, released an infographic last week. The infographic, titled “Process Server vs. Sheriff,” provides a legitimate answer to the question of who people should trust to have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="yui_3_3_0_18_1323298316406299">ServeNow&#8217;s infographic answers the question &#8216;Who should serve my legal papers: the process server or the sheriff?&#8217;</p>
<p>Denver, CO (PRWEB) December 07, 2011</p>
<p>ServeNow.com, a trusted network of process serving professionals, released an infographic last week. The infographic, titled <a title="Process Server vs. Sheriff Infographic" href="http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/SIG=12v1bhj6m/EXP=1324507917/**http%3A//www.serve-now.com/articles/841/process-server-vs-sheriff-infographic">“Process Server vs. Sheriff,”</a> provides a legitimate answer to the question of who people should trust to have their legal papers served: a <a href="http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/SIG=11dfd7q1s/EXP=1324507917/**http%3A//www.serve-now.com/">process server</a> or a sheriff.</p>
<p id="yui_3_3_0_18_1323298316406292">“We had anecdotal evidence of the differences between process servers and sheriffs, but nothing that was supported by unbiased empirical data,” co-founder Trent Carlyle says. “It’s very exciting that we were able to get this information out there.”</p>
<p id="yui_3_3_0_18_1323298316406316">The publication of this research  is timely as some states have passed legislation supporting certified  server programs.  In other areas including Dallas, Texas,  the burden of serving thousands of evictions, lawsuits, divorce  decrees, and child support papers has fallen on the Sheriff’s Office as  an addition to the higher priority responsibility of protecting the  community.</p>
<p id="yui_3_3_0_18_1323298316406309">To get the facts, ServeNow surveyed paralegals, legal assistants,  and legal administrators who have papers served regularly. They also  gathered pricing information from hundreds of process serving firms and  publicly available sheriff pricing.</p>
<p id="yui_3_3_0_18_1323298316406458">Notable statistics:</p>
<p id="yui_3_3_0_18_1323298316406457">
<ul id="yui_3_3_0_18_1323298316406306">
<li id="yui_3_3_0_18_1323298316406305">
<p id="yui_3_3_0_18_1323298316406304">78% of legal professionals surveyed prefer process servers over sheriffs</p>
</li>
<li> 90% of the time process servers completed the serve faster than sheriffs</li>
<li> Process servers averaged 4.28 out of 5 stars for customer satisfaction vs. the sheriff’s 2.55 stars</li>
<li> Only 13% of those surveyed believe sheriffs know the laws better</li>
<li id="yui_3_3_0_18_1323298316406447"> Process servers were rated more likely to successfully serve the documents</li>
<li id="yui_3_3_0_18_1323298316406452"> The difference in average cost was negligible</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.juratlegal.com/process-servers-v-sheriffs-who-do-you-trust-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

